We decode
the senses —
and put them
to work.

93%Sequential vibrotactile pattern recognition accuracy on forearm 72.4%Sequential vs 42.7% simultaneous accuracy for prosthetic joint feedback ~93%Ceiling accuracy at 240 ms signal duration for prosthetic feedback 92–98%Peak short-pattern accuracy at 300 ms interstimulus interval 95%Vibrotactile discrimination accuracy near wrist & elbow anchors 34 dBIndividual variation range in wrist vibrotactile thresholds 200 HzPeak wrist sensitivity frequency (inner/glabrous skin) 50 dBDynamic range available in the 50–300 Hz band at the inner wrist 30Participants in wrist threshold study across 25–1,000 Hz 14Braille-like patterns tested on a 2×3 actuator forearm array 6Actuators in the forearm vibrotactile display array 4Prosthetic joint positions encoded by the forearm feedback system 826 MPeople worldwide with some form of vision impairment 100×Speedup of reduced-order model vs full-order in room acoustics 3.5×Speedup of the new FOM formulation vs conventional approach 1,513Spatial positions in the Viking HRTF Dataset 20Pinnae in the Viking HRTF dataset 48Individual HRTFs used to train sound-localization AI ~20°Localization error — matching human hearing 3.54%ML prediction error for personalized HRTFs 15Anthropometric parameters used to predict personalized HRTFs 3.3%Pinna notch prediction error — half of prior methods 1,036HRTF measurement positions for synthetic pinna validation 0.25 mmScanner precision for synthetic pinna replication 2×Faster foraging with cross-modal synchrony cues 6×6Grid foraging paradigm with 36 rotating items d = 1.62Effect size for cross-modal cue advantage in foraging 1,800Trials across intensity order illusion experiments 16Participants per experiment in the intensity order illusion study 93%Sequential vibrotactile pattern recognition accuracy on forearm 72.4%Sequential vs 42.7% simultaneous accuracy for prosthetic joint feedback ~93%Ceiling accuracy at 240 ms signal duration for prosthetic feedback 92–98%Peak short-pattern accuracy at 300 ms interstimulus interval 95%Vibrotactile discrimination accuracy near wrist & elbow anchors 34 dBIndividual variation range in wrist vibrotactile thresholds 200 HzPeak wrist sensitivity frequency (inner/glabrous skin) 50 dBDynamic range available in the 50–300 Hz band at the inner wrist 30Participants in wrist threshold study across 25–1,000 Hz 14Braille-like patterns tested on a 2×3 actuator forearm array 6Actuators in the forearm vibrotactile display array 4Prosthetic joint positions encoded by the forearm feedback system 826 MPeople worldwide with some form of vision impairment 100×Speedup of reduced-order model vs full-order in room acoustics 3.5×Speedup of the new FOM formulation vs conventional approach 1,513Spatial positions in the Viking HRTF Dataset 20Pinnae in the Viking HRTF dataset 48Individual HRTFs used to train sound-localization AI ~20°Localization error — matching human hearing 3.54%ML prediction error for personalized HRTFs 15Anthropometric parameters used to predict personalized HRTFs 3.3%Pinna notch prediction error — half of prior methods 1,036HRTF measurement positions for synthetic pinna validation 0.25 mmScanner precision for synthetic pinna replication 2×Faster foraging with cross-modal synchrony cues 6×6Grid foraging paradigm with 36 rotating items d = 1.62Effect size for cross-modal cue advantage in foraging 1,800Trials across intensity order illusion experiments 16Participants per experiment in the intensity order illusion study